Critical Review of "Harnessing AI for Progressive and Sustainable Education in the 21st Century: Case Studies and Insights"

Article reviewed:

Narsareddygari1, S. & Naik, S. M. (2024). Harnessing AI for Progressive and Sustainable Education in the 21st Century: Case Studies and Insights. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(1), 159-165. https://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38is1/24226

Introduction

The article "Harnessing AI for Progressive and Sustainable Education in the 21st Century: Case Studies and Insights" by Sakethreddy Narsareddygari and Santosh Madeva Naik argues that artificial intelligence (AI) has a significant potential to enhance sustainability in education by optimizing resource management, increasing access to education, and improving educational outcomes. The authors emphasize that while AI technologies can facilitate the achievement of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and support initiatives for personalized learning and efficient educational programs, the integration of AI into the educational sector also presents challenges. The article positions AI as a catalyst for change, promising increased personalization, accessibility, and efficiency. However, while the introduction is engaging and establishes the context well, it tends to overstate the potential of AI without equally acknowledging its limitations or ethical implications. The main content is structured around several case studies, which provide practical insights, but occasionally drift into promotional narratives rather than critical evaluation.

Literature review

The literature review demonstrates an understanding of key themes like AI in pedagogy, adaptive learning, and personalized education. It is also structured to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research on the intersection of AI and education. The authors draw upon various reliable sources, including academic journals and industry reports, which lend authority to their claims. Key studies are meticulously cited, showcasing both the benefits and drawbacks of AI integration. 
However, the review could have benefited from a more critical examination of opposing viewpoints or limitations in the current research. Few comparisons, contrasts, or critiques of existing work are made. Additionally, many sources cited are secondary or general reports; peer-reviewed academic work is not strongly emphasized, which detracts from the scholarly credibility of the literature base. The review would benefit from more focused thematic subsections and a clearer synthesis of how prior studies inform the present research.
By providing a balanced view, the authors could reinforce the necessity of addressing potential pitfalls associated with AI in education. These could include cheating on assessments or bypassing the learning process, misusing personal data, incorporating existing societal biases, or dehumanizing the learning environment (Ayala-Pazmiño, 2023).
This article is characterized by clarity and accessibility, making complex topics related to artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainable education comprehensible to a diverse audience. The authors employ a formal tone while skillfully avoiding unnecessary jargon, which enhances the article's readability without compromising academic rigour. Their structured organization enables readers to follow the flow of argumentation seamlessly, while the balanced presentation of the benefits and challenges of AI integration demonstrates a critical approach to the subject matter. This thoughtful engagement with relevant themes, alongside effective use of empirical evidence and references, contributes to a nuanced understanding of the topic. Overall, the writing effectively bridges scholarly insight with practical relevance, making it accessible to academic and non-academic audiences interested in the intersections of technology and education.

Theory

The theoretical framework underlying the article is rooted in the principles of sustainability and educational improvement through technology. The authors suggest that AI can serve as a catalyst for educational transformation, aligning with the ideals of progressive education that emphasize adaptability and personalized learning. However, the theoretical basis could be elaborated further to provide a more robust foundation for the analysis. Engaging more deeply with educational theories relevant to technology integration would enhance the article's conceptual depth.

The article lacks an explicit theoretical framework. While concepts like personalized learning and technological determinism are hinted at, they are not formally grounded in any educational theory (e.g., constructivism, connectivism, or critical pedagogy). This absence weakens the analytical depth, as the discussion would benefit from a lens through which AI's influence on education could be critically interpreted.

Methodology 

The article adopts a qualitative, exploratory case study approach. It aims to examine real-world examples of AI integration in educational contexts to draw insights about its potential for sustainable and progressive education. While the case study approach is suitable for investigating complex, context-specific phenomena like educational technology, the article does not offer a strong methodological justification. There are no explicit reasons why those case studies were chosen over other qualitative methods (e.g., interviews, focus groups) or mixed methods weren't considered for a more robust analysis. The methodology section is also brief and lacks depth. It does not specify how the case studies were selected, how data was gathered, or how many cases were analyzed. This absence of transparency affects the study's credibility and reproducibility.

The article does not clearly outline the data collection methods and the case studies may have been gathered from secondary sources, such as institutional reports, existing literature, or publicly available documentation. However, this is not explicitly stated. There is no mention of primary data collection (e.g., interviews, observations, surveys), which significantly limits the scope and validity of the findings. There are also critical details missing such as the stakeholders involved, the criteria used for selecting the case studies and the considered time frame.

The article presents thematic insights from the selected case studies (e.g., AI for personalized learning, administrative automation, AI-assisted tutoring). However, there is no detailed description of how these themes were identified or analyzed, making the analysis appear anecdotal and descriptive rather than systematic and evidence-driven, and challenging to assess the rigour of the findings.

Findings

The findings of the study reveal significant insights into how AI technologies can enhance resource efficiency and offer innovative educational solutions. By presenting various case studies, the authors demonstrate measurable impacts such as improved agricultural efficiency and reduced energy consumption through AI applications. However, while the findings highlight positive outcomes, they could be contextualized within broader trends that understand AI's role in sustainable education.

Discussions

The authors adeptly connect their findings to the larger narrative of AI and sustainability in education. They acknowledge the ethical concerns and challenges that accompany AI integration, such as data privacy and algorithmic bias. This critical engagement with the challenges encourages a reflective stance on the implications of deploying AI in educational contexts. Nevertheless, the authors could enhance this section by proposing concrete strategies or frameworks for addressing these ethical considerations. Further, engaging with stakeholders' perspectives would enrich the discussion, providing practical insights into the implementation of AI technologies in educational settings.

Conclusion

Overall, "Harnessing AI for Progressive and Sustainable Education in the 21st Century" is an insightful exploration of the intersection of AI and education with a focus on sustainability. The article is well-structured and grounded in reputable literature. Nevertheless, it could benefit from a more robust theoretical framework, greater transparency in methodology and educational theories, and a deeper engagement with ethical implications. By addressing these areas, the authors could provide a more comprehensive view of the role of AI in shaping sustainable educational practices.

References

Ayala-Pazmiño , M. (2023). Inteligencia artificial en la educación: Explorando los beneficios y riesgos potenciales. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(3), 892-899. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.3.1827

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas más populares de este blog

Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) in learning experiences

Imagen
By Jimena Taquire Meeting mammals on a farm Within the framework of the course Design of Learning Experiences in Virtual Environments in my 5th year of my B.Ed. program, my group and I designed a virtual reality environment through CoSpaces Edu. This experience corresponds to the area of ​​Science and Technology and is aimed at third-grade primary school students. The objective of this innovation proposal is for students to compare and describe the biological characteristics of mammalian animals that live on a farm. To do this, students will learn the biological characteristics of cows, horses, and sheep, as well as compare these characteristics, such as their type of reproduction, type of food, etc. You can learn more about this experience by clicking on the following link or scanning the QR code: https://edu.cospaces.io/LPS-ZJU My group and I designed an augmented reality environment through CoSpaces Edu. In this experience, students will learn about the biological characteristi...
Leer más

Case Study Analysis: Project-Based Learning using technology to Enhance Historical Thinking

 By Jimena Taquire 1. Introduction In an era of rapid technological advancement, educators are constantly seeking innovative approaches to engage students and foster deeper learning. To this end, developing robust historical thinking skills is crucial for students to become informed and engaged citizens. This case study aims to reflect on the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) enriched with interactive technology platforms in fostering historical thinking skills. Specifically, it examines how this approach can be effectively implemented to enhance historical thinking skills, moving beyond rote memorization to cultivate critical analysis, empathy, and a nuanced understanding of the past. For the making of this case study, AI tools were used to analyze resources, make a literature review, and obtain ideas (Brainstorming) for the evaluation framework. 2. Pedagogical planning This case study was intentionally aligned with PBL's key educational frameworks, designed to foster...
Leer más

Removing Barriers in Executive Functioning on UDL and technology

By Jimena Taquire Personal Reflection on UDL and Technology in Removing Barriers in Education A teaching and learning practice that often creates barriers to executive functioning for diverse learners in traditional classroom delivery or assessment is the  reliance on timed tests and assessments. These assessments  are commonly used in classrooms to measure students’ understanding and mastery of content. These assessments typically have a set amount of time within which students are expected to complete all questions or tasks, often under pressure to finish quickly. In this context,  relying on timed tests and assessments  creates  barriers to essential executive functions  such as attention, working memory, time management, and self-regulation. Instead of supporting deep learning and allowing students to demonstrate their understanding, it can exacerbate challenges faced by students who need more time or who experience anxiety, ADHD, or other cognitive di...
Leer más